This article titled “Cases taking 19 months to get to appeal court owing to backlogs” was written by Owen Bowcott Legal affairs correspondent, for theguardian.com on Monday 7th March 2016 19.35 UTCJohn Fawcett has joined the firm as Partner
Cases are taking up to 19 months to reach trial in the court of appeal because of increasing courtroom backlogs, according to the judge in charge of introducing online justice.
Lord Justice Briggs, who is due to deliver his final report on transforming the courts this summer, suggested a future of paperless hearings could lead to more cases being listed outside London.
He said his review would for the first time examine how long it takes judges to complete cases. The introduction of online courts, which will develop more investigative rather than traditional adversarial methods, would also, he hoped, speed up the processing of claims.
However, the development of online justice for cases involving claims of less than £25,000 will inevitably require state funding to provide help for those unskilled in completing complex online applications, the judge cautioned.
Around £730m is already being provided by the Ministry of Justice over the next four years to drive through digitisation of a legal industry that is almost as paper-dominated as it was in the times of Charles Dickens.
Addressing a conference on commercial litigation organised by the City law firm Addleshaw Goddard, Briggs said: “There is a 19-month backlog for cases to be heard at the court of appeal.
“There is an inquiry into the delays. We are looking at whether to have more court of appeal judges or whether to have more high court judges deputising for them.”
There are traditionally 38 court of appeal judges in England and Wales. Briggs’s assessment of the length of delays in the higher courts reflects a rapidly deteriorating problem; last summer, the delays were said to be just over a year.
Lord Justice Briggs has already visited the Netherlands to inspect its system of online courts. He is due to study online dispute resolution initiatives in the USA and Canada in the coming months.
The advent of online justice would not be cost-free, the judge, who is deputy head of the civil judiciary, warned. The commonly accepted figure of only 10% of the population never going online was likely to be an underestimate of the proportion of the population who would need help if they sought justice via the web.
“The government will have to provide, at taxpayers’ expense, a system of assistance to people with computer access difficulties,” Briggs explained. “I don’t regard a telephone helpline as going the whole way by any means. HMCTS [the courts service] is well aware of the need to deploy digital help.”
The programme to introduce paper-free hearings is running in parallel with the development of online courts. There has also been criticism of proposals that lower-cost claims could be dealt with by non-lawyers.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010
Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.
Related posts
